Tuesday Night time Owls: Leaders who severely handle the local weather disaster will face fascism on steroids


There’s a robust pressure of white nationalism and neo-Nazism that ran by way of Wednesday’s rebellion, and it’s simple to think about what’s going to occur when flames or storms hit locations which can be predominantly Black, brown, or Indigenous. In actual fact, we don’t have to think about it in any respect. We’ve seen it within the gunman who confirmed up at a Walmart to kill immigrants whom he falsely blamed for placing pressure on the setting. And we noticed it within the white vigilante violence within the vacuum after Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans. We’ve seen it so steadily, it even has a reputation: ecofascism.

After Wednesday, the boundaries of permissible violence have now expanded to a distorting diploma, at a time of accelerating local weather instability. White supremacists, neo-Nazis, and different extremists actually took over the halls of energy and received away with it. When local weather change upends communities with far fewer defenses—communities that hate teams already scapegoat—the outcomes can be catastrophic.

It’s by no means been clearer that a big chunk of the nation’s prime Republican leaders will embrace and even gasoline this extremism and hate. The Venn diagram of people that push election denial and local weather denial has near-perfect overlap, however even when these figures deny the local weather disaster, they’ll nonetheless look to take advantage of it. On the finish of the day, their objective is to make use of easy-to-disprove lies to construct and consolidate energy.

Fixing a large number like this totally needs to be a part of the method of addressing local weather change. Accountability for individuals who incited extremists is an effective place to begin. […]






“A nation can survive its fools, and even the bold. But it surely can’t survive treason from inside. An enemy on the gates is much less formidable, for he’s recognized and carries his banner overtly. However the traitor strikes amongst these throughout the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling by way of all of the alleys, heard within the very halls of presidency itself.” ~~Marcus Tullius Cicero, Orations, The fourteen orations in opposition to Marcus Antonius (63 BCE)


On this date at Every day Kos in 2007The Uniter Divides: Bush plan fractures the DLC:

Nicely, the evaluations are in. Bush’s 11% doctrine speech was a bomb IED.

So now, the scramble is on for politicians of all stripes to distance themselves from his idiotic “plan.” After all, that surge was nicely underway even earlier than the teleprompter was even connected, and Democratic presidential candidates have been among the many first to seek out their option to the microphones.

I would spherical ’em up for you, however that is not truly what this put up is about. This put up is concerning the few “Democrats” who did not distance themselves. No Democratic presidential candidate was that silly, after all. And no, I am not even speaking about Lieberman.

I am speaking concerning the DLC wonks.

In yesterday’s LA Times, Will Marshall stunk up the joint on behalf of the DLC, from his perch on the “Progressive Coverage Institute,” the DLC’s “suppose” tank:

“Typical knowledge says that presidential candidates who wish to be accountable on this are going to harm themselves with the offended, impassioned activist left,” mentioned Will Marshall, president of the Progressive Coverage Institute, a centrist Democratic suppose tank. “However the activist left is out of sync with the American public. Individuals do not wish to concede this can be a whole debacle.”