From the starting of the COVID-19 pandemic, the clarion name has been to check, check and check some extra. Nonetheless, proper from the beginning, severe questions arose about the exams getting used to diagnose this an infection, and questions have solely multiplied since then.
Constructive reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) exams have been used because the justification for holding giant parts of the world locked down for the higher a part of 2020.
This, regardless of the truth that PCR exams have confirmed remarkably unreliable with excessive false consequence charges, and are not designed for use as a diagnostic device within the first place as they can not distinguish between inactive viruses and “dwell” or reproductive ones.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice chairman and scientific director of Pfizer, has even gone on report stating1 that false constructive outcomes from unreliable PCR exams are getting used to “manufacture a ‘second wave’ primarily based on ‘new instances,'” when in truth a second wave is extremely unlikely.
Understanding PCR Checks
Earlier than his loss of life, the inventor of the PCR check, Kary Mullis, repeatedly but unsuccessfully confused that this check shouldn’t be used as a diagnostic device for the easy purpose that it is incapable of diagnosing illness. A constructive check doesn’t really imply that an energetic an infection is current. As famous in a U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and prevention publication on coronavirus and PCR testing dated July 13 2020:2
- Detection of viral RNA might not point out the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for scientific signs.
- The efficiency of this check has not been established for monitoring therapy of 2019-nCoV an infection.
- This check can’t rule out ailments attributable to different bacterial or viral pathogens.
So, what does the PCR test actually tell us? The PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. Nonetheless, the genetic snippets are so small they should be amplified with a purpose to develop into discernible. Every spherical of amplification is named a cycle.
Amplification over 35 cycles is taken into account unreliable and scientifically unjustified, but Drosten exams and exams advisable by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles.
What this does is amplify any, even insignificant sequences of viral DNA that is likely to be current to the purpose that the check reads “constructive,” even when the viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive. Because of these extreme cycle thresholds, you find yourself with a far larger variety of constructive exams than you would in any other case.
We have additionally had issues with defective and contaminated exams. As quickly because the genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2 grew to become out there in January 2020, German researchers rapidly developed a PCR check for the virus.
In March 2020, The New York Occasions3 reported the preliminary check kits developed by the CDC had been discovered to be flawed. The Verge additionally reported4 that this flawed CDC check in flip grew to become the idea for the WHO’s check, which the CDC ended up refusing to make use of.
PCR Checks Can’t Detect An infection
Maybe most importantly of all, the PCR exams can’t distinguish between inactive viruses and “dwell” or reproductive ones. What meaning is that PCR exams can’t detect an infection. Interval. It can’t inform you whether or not you are at present in poor health, whether or not you will develop signs within the close to future, or whether or not you are contagious.
The exams might decide up lifeless particles or inactive viral particles that pose no threat in anyway to the affected person and others. What’s extra, the check can decide up the presence of different coronaviruses, so a constructive consequence might merely point out that you have recuperated from a standard chilly up to now.
An “an infection” is when a virus penetrates right into a cell and replicates. Because the virus multiplies, signs set in. An individual is just infectious if the virus is definitely replicating. So long as the virus is inactive and never replicating, it is fully innocent each to the host and others.
Likelihood is, you probably have no signs, a constructive check merely means it has detected inactive viral DNA in your physique. This may additionally imply that you’re not contagious and pose no threat to anybody.
For all of these causes, quite a few extremely revered scientists world wide at the moment are saying that what now we have isn’t a COVID-19 pandemic however a PCR check pandemic. In his September 20, 2020, article5 “Lies, Damned Lies and Well being Statistics — The Lethal Hazard of False Positives,” Yeadon explains why basing our pandemic response on constructive PCR exams is so problematic.
Briefly, it seems thousands and thousands of persons are merely being discovered to hold inactive viral DNA that pose no threat to anybody, but these check outcomes are being utilized by the global technocracy to implement a model new economic and social system based on draconian surveillance and totalitarian controls.
Artificially Created Justifications for Totalitarian Controls
As reported by The Vaccine Response, September 29, 2020:6
“The check’s threshold is so excessive that it detects folks with the dwell virus in addition to these with just a few genetic fragments left over from a previous an infection that not poses a threat. It is like discovering a hair in a room after an individual left it, says Michael Mina, MD, an epidemiologist on the Harvard T.H. Chan College of Public Well being.7
In three units of testing knowledge that embody cycle thresholds compiled by officers in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, as much as 90% of folks testing constructive carried barely any virus, a evaluation by The New York Occasions discovered8 …
‘We have been utilizing one kind of knowledge for every part, and that’s simply plus or minus — that is all,’ Dr. Mina stated. ‘We’re utilizing that for scientific diagnostics, for public well being, for coverage decision-making.’
However ‘sure’ or ‘no’ is not adequate, he added. It is the quantity of virus that ought to dictate the contaminated affected person’s subsequent steps. ‘It is actually irresponsible, I feel, to forgo the popularity that this can be a quantitative situation,’ Dr. Mina stated.”
Once more, medical consultants agree any cycle threshold over 35 cycles makes the check too delicate, as at that time it begins choosing up innocent inactive DNA fragments. Mina believes a extra affordable cutoff can be 30 or much less.
In accordance with The New York Occasions,9 the CDC’s personal calculations present it is extraordinarily unlikely to detect dwell viruses in samples which have gone by means of greater than 33 cycles, and analysis10 revealed in April 2020 concluded sufferers with constructive PCR exams that had a cycle threshold above 33 weren’t contagious and will safely be discharged from the hospital or dwelling isolation.
Importantly, when officers on the New York state laboratory, the Wadsworth Heart, reanalyzed testing knowledge at The Occasions’ request, they discovered that altering the edge from 40 cycles to 35 cycles eradicated about 43% of the constructive outcomes. Limiting it to 30 cycles eradicated a whopping 63%.11 The Vaccine Response provides:12
“In Massachusetts, from 85 to 90% of people that examined constructive in July with a cycle threshold of 40 would have been deemed unfavorable if the threshold had been 30 cycles, Dr. Mina stated. ‘I might say that none of these folks must be contact-traced, not one,’ he stated.
‘I am actually shocked that it could possibly be that top — the proportion of folks with excessive CT worth outcomes,’ stated Ashish Jha, MD, director of the Harvard International Well being Institute. ‘Boy, does it actually change the way in which we have to be excited about testing’13 …
In late August, the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) permitted the primary speedy coronavirus check that does not want any particular laptop tools. Made by Abbot Laboratories, the 15-minute check [BinaxNOW] will promote for U.S. $5 however nonetheless requires a nasal swab to be taken by a well being employee.14
The Abbot check is the fourth speedy point-of-care check that appears for the presence of antigens slightly than the virus’s genetic code because the PCR molecular exams do.15“
Large Waste of Assets
As famous by Dr. Tom Jefferson and professor Carl Henegan in an October 31, 2020, article within the Every day Mail,16 mass PCR testing has been an enormous waste or assets, because it would not present us with the knowledge we really have to know — who’s infectious, how far is the virus spreading and how briskly does it unfold?
As an alternative, it has led to financial devastation from enterprise shutdowns and isolating noninfectious folks of their houses for weeks and months on finish. Jefferson and Henegan declare they shared their pandemic response plan with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson over a month in the past, and simply offered it to him once more. “We urge him to listen and embrace it,” they write, including:
“There are solely two issues about which we might be sure: first, that lockdowns don’t work within the lengthy time period … The concept a month of financial hardship will allow some type of ‘reset’, permitting us a brighter future, is a fable. What, when it ends, will we suppose will occur? In the meantime, ever-increasing restrictions will destroy lives and livelihoods.
The second certainty is this: that we have to discover a means out of the mess that does no extra injury than the virus itself … Our technique can be to deal with the 4 key failings.”
These 4 areas are:
- Addressing the issues within the authorities’s mass testing program
- Addressing “the blight of confused and contradictory statistics”
- Shield and isolate the susceptible — primarily the aged, but additionally hospitalized sufferers usually and workers — whereas permitting the remainder to keep up “some semblance of regular life”
- Inform the general public in regards to the true and quantifiable prices of lockdown that “kill folks simply as absolutely as COVID-19”
“If we do these items, there’s actual hope that we are able to be taught to dwell with the virus. That, in spite of everything, was alleged to be the plan,” Jefferson and Henegan observe. With regard to testing, the pair name “for a nationwide program of testing high quality management to make sure that outcomes are correct, exact and constant.”
Importantly, we should not depend on constructive/unfavorable readings alone. The outcomes should be assessed in relation to different elements, such because the age of the topic and whether or not they’re symptomatic, to find out who really poses an infectious threat. You possibly can evaluation the total particulars of their proposed plan on the finish of their Every day Mail article.17
Lockdown Risks Have Been Stored Out of Public Dialogue
Jefferson and Henegan aren’t the one ones highlighting the incontrovertible fact that the worldwide lockdown technique is inflicting extra hurt and destruction than the virus itself. In a June 16, 2020 article in The Federalist, James Lucas, a New York Metropolis legal professional, wrote:18
“If we’ll enable fashions and modelers to dictate the complete nature of our society, one would hope that the fashions are as full as attainable. But the epidemiological fashions which have so remodeled our world are critically incomplete, and due to this fact essentially insufficient.
Any medical remedy is alleged to be examined for each efficacy and security. There have been a number of research19 inspecting the effectiveness of the lockdowns in combating the unfold of the COVID-19 virus, with combined conclusions.
Thus far, nonetheless, none of those research or fashions have analyzed the security aspect of the lockdown remedy. In response to questions from doctor Sens. Rand Paul and Invoice Cassidy, Dr. Anthony Fauci admits20 this aspect of the equation has not been accounted for within the fashions now driving our world.
As famous in an open letter21 lately signed by greater than 600 health-care professionals, the general public well being prices from the lockdowns — described as a ‘mass casualty incident’ are actual and rising.
These fashions are estimations primarily based on present analysis. The always altering projections of coronavirus deaths are extrapolations from analysis on earlier epidemics. But modelers haven’t any excuse for leaving evaluations of the lockdowns’ huge prices to public well being out of their fashions.”
The Hidden Prices of Lockdowns
How does the “lockdown remedy” have an effect on public security? In his article, Lucas highlights the following:22
• Elevated continual illness charges on account of unemployment, poverty and placing non-COVID medical care on maintain — Analysis23 by the Veterans Administration has proven delaying most cancers therapy for only one month led to a 20% improve in mortality. One other examine24 discovered every one-month delay in breast most cancers prognosis elevated mortality by 10%
• Elevated charges of psychological well being issues on account of unemployment and isolation
• Elevated mortality charges from suicide — In a single examine,25 being unemployed was related to a twofold to threefold larger relative threat of suicide. A newer examine26 estimates “deaths of despair” linked to lockdowns could also be round 75,000 within the U.S.
• Diminished collective life span — Prolonged unemployment can be related with shorter, unhealthier lives. Hannes Schwandt, a well being economics researcher at Northwestern College, estimates an prolonged financial shutdown may shorten the lifespan of 6.4 million People getting into the job market by a median of about two years.27 Lucas notes:
“If epidemiologists do not care to take account of this toll, one other career should. A examine28 simply launched by a bunch of South African actuaries estimates that the online discount in lifespan from elevated unemployment and poverty on account of a nationwide lockdown will exceed the elevated lifespan on account of lives saved from COVID-19 by the lockdown by an element of 30 to 1.
In different phrases, every year of extra life attributable to isolating potential coronavirus victims within the lockdown comes at a value of 30 years misplaced as a result of unfavorable public well being results of a lockdown …”
Lack of schooling can be related to considerably shorter life spans and poorer well being. Highschool drop-outs die on common 9 years ahead of faculty graduates,29 and college closings disproportionally have an effect on poorer college students.
Who Pays the Most?
As famous by Lucas, along with calculating the general prices on society, modelers should additionally decide “on whom these prices fall,” as a result of the prices aren’t borne equally by all. The results of the lockdowns disproportionally have an effect on those that are already essentially the most susceptible — financially and well being smart — resembling these dwelling close to the poverty line, the chronically in poor health, folks with psychological sickness and minorities in normal.
“Opposite to the PR slogan, we’re NOT all on this collectively,” Lucas writes.30 “We’d like much less insipid pro-lockdown propaganda extolling the virtues of the ‘important’ staff, and extra severe evaluation of the big public well being toll the lockdowns are imposing on them. In any other case, we might come to see the period of coronavirus as merely the time the place pro-lockdown elites sacrificed the working class31 to guard themselves.”
A Pandemic of Fearmongering
An October 28, 2020, article featured by the Ron Paul Institute factors out that:32
“Ever for the reason that alleged pandemic erupted this previous March the mainstream media has spewed a continuous stream of misinformation that seems to be laser centered on producing most worry among the many citizenry.
However the details and the science merely do not assist the grave image painted of a lethal virus sweeping the land. Sure, we do have a pandemic, however it’ a pandemic of ginned up pseudo-science masquerading as unbiased truth.”
9 details that may be backed up with knowledge “paints a really totally different image from the worry and dread being relentlessly drummed into the brains of unsuspecting residents,” the article states. Along with the truth that PCR testing is virtually ineffective, for all the explanations already talked about, these data-backed details embody:
1. A constructive check is NOT a “case” — As defined by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Medical doctors for Catastrophe Preparedness33 lecture, featured in “How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible,” media and public well being officers seem to have purposefully conflated “instances” or constructive exams with the precise sickness.
Medically talking, a “case” refers to a sick particular person. It by no means ever referred to somebody who had no signs of sickness. Now impulsively, this well-established medical time period, “case,” has been fully and arbitrarily redefined to imply somebody who examined constructive for the presence of viral RNA. As famous by Merritt, “That’s not epidemiology. That is fraud.”
2. In accordance to the CDC34 and different analysis knowledge,35 the COVID-19 survival price is over 99%, and the overwhelming majority of deaths happen in these over 70, which is near regular life expectancy.
3. CDC evaluation reveals 85% of sufferers testing constructive for COVID-19 wore face masks “usually” or “at all times” within the two weeks previous their constructive check. As famous within the Ron Paul article,36 “The one rational conclusion from this examine is that material face masks provide little if any safety from Covid-19 an infection.”
4. There are cheap, confirmed profitable therapies for COVID-19 — Examples embody numerous regimens involving hydroxychloroquine with zinc and antibiotics, quercetin-based protocols, the MATH+ protocol and nebulized hydrogen peroxide.
5. The loss of life price has not risen regardless of pandemic deaths — Information37,38 present the general all-cause mortality has remained regular throughout 2020 and would not veer from the norm. In different phrases, COVID-19 has not killed off extra of the inhabitants than would have died in any given yr anyway.
As famous within the Ron Paul article,39 “In accordance with the CDC as of early Might 2020 the entire variety of deaths within the US was 944,251 from January 1 — April thirtieth. That is really barely decrease than the variety of deaths throughout the identical interval in 2017 when 946,067 whole deaths had been reported.”
15,000 Medical doctors and Scientists Name for Finish to Lockdowns
All in all, there are various causes to suspect that continued lockdowns, social distancing and mask mandates are fully pointless and won’t considerably alter the course of this pandemic sickness, or the ultimate loss of life depend.
And, with regard to common PCR testing the place people are examined each two weeks or much more ceaselessly, whether or not they have signs or not, that is clearly a pointless effort that yields ineffective knowledge. It is only a tool to spread fear, which in flip permits for the speedy implementation of the totalitarian management mechanisms required to pull off The Great Reset. Thankfully, an increasing number of folks at the moment are beginning to see by means of this plot.
About 45,000 scientists and docs worldwide have already signed the Nice Barrington Declaration,40 which requires the top to all lockdowns and implementation of a herd immunity method to the pandemic, which means governments ought to enable people who find themselves not at vital threat of great COVID-19 sickness to return to regular life, as the lockdown method is having a devastating impact on public well being — far worse than the virus itself.41,42 The declaration states:43
“Coming from each the left and proper, and world wide, now we have devoted our careers to defending folks. Present lockdown insurance policies are producing devastating results on brief and long-term public well being …
The most compassionate method that balances the dangers and advantages of reaching herd immunity, is to permit those that are at minimal threat of loss of life to dwell their lives usually to construct up immunity to coronavirus by means of pure an infection, whereas higher defending those that are at highest threat. We name this centered safety.”
The declaration factors out that present lockdown insurance policies will end in extra mortality sooner or later, primarily amongst youthful folks and the working class. As of November 5, 2020, The Nice Barrington Declaration44 had been signed by 11,791 medical and public well being scientists, 33,903 medical practitioners and 617,685 “involved residents.”45